Leadership and Supervision on Work Discipline and Its Impact on Employee Performance at Service Education Musi Rawas District
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47747/icbem.v1i1.1297Abstract
This study aims to determine and test the effect of leadership on work discipline, to determine the effect of supervision on work discipline, to determine the effect of leadership on employee performance, to determine the effect of supervision on performance, to determine the effect of work discipline on employee performance, to determine the effect of leadership on employee performance through work discipline, to determine the effect of supervision on employee performance through work discipline. This research was conducted at the Musi Rawas District Education Office, with a population of 66 employees. The sample in this study were employees who worked at the Musi Rawas District Education Office, totaling 65 employees. The reason for not including the Head of the Education Office is because it is a research subject related to variables. This research method uses quantitative research using causal relationships and types of primary data. Data collection techniques by observing, interviewing, distributing questionnaires and documentation. The analytical method uses Smart PLS 3.2.9. The results of this study indicate that leadership has a positive and significant effect on work discipline with a t-statistic value of 1.653> 1.64 (t-table) and a p-value of 0.099> 0.05. Leadership has a positive but not significant effect on employee performance with a t-statistic value of 1.372 <1.64 (t-table) and a p-value of 0.171> 0.05. Supervision has a positive and significant effect on work discipline with a t-statistic value of 15.743> 1.64 (t-table) and a p-value of 0.000 <0.05. Supervision has a positive but not significant effect on employee performance with a t-statistic value of 0.427 <1.64 (t-table) and a p-value of 0.670 > 0.05. Work discipline has a positive and significant effect on employee performance with a t-statistic value of 1.937> 1.64 (t-table) and a p-value of 0.053> 0.05. Leadership on employee performance with work discipline as a mediating variable with a t-statistic value of 1.105<1.64 (t-table) and a p-value of 0.135>0.05. Supervision of employee performance with work discipline as a mediating variable with a t-statistic value of 1.992 > 1.64 (t-table) and a p-value of 0.023 <0.05. so there are direct and indirect influences between leadership on employee performance, and monitoring of employee performance through work discipline as a mediating or intervention variable.
References
Abdillah. Willy & Jogiyanto. (2016). Partial Least Square. C.V Andi Ofset.
Afandi. Pandi. (2021). Concepth & Indicator Human Resource Management (2 ed.). Zanafa Publishing.
Badeni. (2017). Kepemimpinan & Perilaku Organisasi (9 ed.). Alfabeta, CV.
Busro. Muhammad. (2022). Teori-teori Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (2 ed.). Prenamedia Group.
Conchita, V. (2021). Dasar-dasar Manajemen. CV. Media Sains Indonesia.
Fahmi. Irham. (2017). Manajemen Kepemimpinan Teori & Aplikasi (4 ed.). Alfabeta, CV.
Ghazali. Imam. (2015). Smart PLS 3.0 (2 ed.). Universitas Diponogoro Semarang.
Hamali A. (2016). Pemahaman Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. GAPS (Center for Academia Publishing Service).
Haryono. S. (2017). Metode SEM Untuk Penelitian Manajemen AMOS LISREL PLS. Luxima Metro Media.
Hasibuan. Malayu. (2018). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (22 ed.). PT Bumi Aksara.
Kasmir. (2019). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (5 ed.). PT RajaGrafindo Persada, Depok.
Kuddy. Andarias. (2017). Pengaruh Kepemimpinan, Motivasi, Dan Disiplin Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Pada Dinas Pertanian Dan Ketahanan Pangan Provinsi Papua. Jurnal Manajemen & Bisnis, VOLUME 1, pp 22-36.
Priansa D. (2017). Manajemen Kinerja Kepegawaian. CV Pustaka Setia.
Rompas. Goverd Adler Clinton, Tewal. Bernhard, & L. D. (2018). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan, Pengawasan, Dan Disiplin Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Pada Dinas Perhubungan Kabupaten Minahasa Tenggara. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 6(4), 1978–1987.
Rudiansyah & Amalia. (2019). Pengaruh Kepemimpinan dan Disiplin Kerja terhadap Kinerja Pegawai pada Dinas Pendidikan Kota Banjarmasin. Jurnal Riset Inspirasi Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan, 3 No. 2(2), 94–102. https://doi.org/10.35130/jrimk.v3i2
Safuan & Ismartaya. (2019). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Alfabeta, CV.
Saputra & Harianto. (2022). Pengaruh Pengawasan Kerja Dan Disiplin Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Pada Pt Centric Powerindo Di Kota Batam. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 8(1), 672–683.
Sinambela L.P. (2019). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (4 ed.). PT Bumi Aksara.https://books.google.co.id/googlebooks/images/kennedy/insert_link.png
Soetopo. Hendayat. (2016). Perilaku Organisasi (10 ed.). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sugiyono. (2019). Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitattif & Pengembangan. Alfabeta, CV.
Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D (2 ed.). ALFABETA, cv.
Surajiyo, Nasruddin, & P. H. (2022). Penelitian Sumber Daya Manusia. Deepublish (Grup Penerbitan CV Budi Utama).
Surajiyo, Nasruddin, & Paleni, H. (2020). Kepuasan Kerja sebagai Variabel Intervening pada Pengaruh Kepemimpinan dan Lingkungan Kerja terhadap Kinerja Pegawai di Kecamatan Lubuklinggau Selatan I dan Selatan II. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Bisnis dan Inovasi Universitas Sam Ratulangi, 7(3), 416–428.
Sutrisno.Edy. (2017). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (9 ed.). Kencana.
Triana & Feriyanto. (2015). Pengantar Manajemen. Mediatera.
Wahyudi. Dadang. (2022). Pengaruh Pengawasan Dan Disiplin Terhadap Motivasi Serta Dampaknya Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Dinas Kebudayaan Dan Pariwisata Provinsi Sumatera Selatan. Manajemen & Bisnis.
Wibowo. (2016). Manajemen Kinerja (5 ed.). PT RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta.
