Bilateral Investment Treaty and Foreign Direct Investment in India

A Dynamic Panel GMM Estimation of Causal Effects

Authors

  • Lakshmanasamy T. University of Madras

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47747/ijbme.v1i2.442

Keywords:

Bilateral Investment Treaty, Foreign Direct Investment, Generalised method of moments

Abstract

India has one of the largest Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) networks with other counties around the world. The BITs is to promote foreign investment by increasing investor confidence, empowering individual private parties to take international arbitral proceedings against the threat of appropriation by the government of the host country. This paper analyses the effect of BITs on FDI inflows in India using panel data for 76 countries for the time period 2000-2016 applying a dynamic panel generalised method of moments instrumental variable estimation method. The differenced GMM and system GMM estimates show a significant negative effect of bilateral investment treaties on the FDI inflows in India. While the lagged FDI has a significant positive effect, the financial openness of the source nations is reducing FDI inflows to India. The POLCON index shows that the countries with lesser political constraints have positive FDI outflow towards India. As opposed to domestic variables, the Chinn-Ito and POLCON indices have a greater share of change in FDI inflows to India. It seems that the BITs is not efficient enough to create investor confidence to invest in India.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aisbett, E., M. Busse and P. Nunnenkamp (2018) “Bilateral Investment Treaties as Deterrents of Host-country Discretion: The Impact of Investor-State Disputes on Foreign Direct Investment in Developing Countries, Review of World Economics, 154, 1, 119-155.

Busse, M., J. Koniger and P. Nunnenkamp (2010) “FDI Promotion Through Bilateral Investment Treaties: More Than A Bit?”, Review of World Economics, 146, 1, 147-177.

Buthe, T. (2010) “Politics and Institutions in the Regulation of Global Capital: A Review Article”, Review of International Organizations, 3, 2, 207-220.

Buthe, T. and H.V. Milner (2008) “The Politics of Foreign Direct Investment into Developing Countries: Increasing FDI Through International Trade Agreements”, American Journal of Political Science, 52, 4, 741-762.

Chinn, M.D. and H. Ito (2008) “A New Measure of Financial Openness”, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 10, 3, 309-322.

Mina, W. (2015) “Political Risk Guarantees and Capital Flows: The Role of Bilateral Investment Treaties”, Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 9, 1-38.

Neumayer, and L. Spess (2005) “Do Bilateral Investment Treaties Increase Foreign Direct Investment to Developing Countries”, World Development, Vol. 33, 10, 1567-1585.

Ranjan, P. (2010) “Indian Investment Treaty Programme in the Light of Global Experiences”, Economic and Political Weekly, 45, 7, February 13, 68-72.

Tobin, J. and S. Rose-Ackerman (2011) “When BITs Have Some Bite: The Political-Economic Environment for Bilateral Investment Treaties, Review of International Organizations, 6, 1, 1-32.

Downloads

Published

2021-11-09

How to Cite

T., L. (2021). Bilateral Investment Treaty and Foreign Direct Investment in India: A Dynamic Panel GMM Estimation of Causal Effects. International Journal of Business, Management and Economics, 1(2), 53 - 68. https://doi.org/10.47747/ijbme.v1i2.442