Tax Structure Implications on Exchange Rate and Infrastructural Development in Nigeria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47747/jat.v3i2.1092Keywords:
Tax Structures, Petroleum Profit Tax, Corporate income Tax, Value Added Tax, Exchange Rate, Public debt, Capital ExpenditureAbstract
The study examined the relationship between tax structure and exchange rate, and capital expenditure using secondary data obtained from Central bank of Nigeria and Federal inland revenue annual bulletin for the period 1994 to 2022 using multiple regression and auto regressive distributive lag. Tax structure was divided into direct and indirect tax consisting of PPT, CIT and VAT while the dependent variable was proxied by exchange rate and capital expenditure. Unit root test for stationarity was conducted using Augmented Dickey Fuller and Kwiatkowski Phillips Schmidt Findings show that in the short run the coefficients of the tax structure variables passed the significance test at the 5 percent level indicating that tax revenues critically influence short run changes in capital expenditure. The coefficients of current PPT, current CIT and complete VAT are all positive, which show that all forms of taxes promote capital spending by government in Nigeria in the short run. Thus, increasing tax revenues will immediately deliver positive impacts on the budgetary provisions for capital spending in Nigeria. The study also found that capital expenditure improves exchange rate, the positive impact of tax revenues on short run capital expenditure confirms that taxes have significant indirect impact on short run macroeconomic performance in Nigeria. The long run results also report interesting outcomes The coefficients of the two direct tax components are significant at the 5 percent level, while that of VAT failed the test at the 5 percent level. This result shows that while PPT and CIT significantly influence capital expenditures in Nigeria, VAT has no significant impact. It also suggests that VAT does not exert indirect long run effects on macroeconomic performance through the capital expenditure channel. The coefficient of CIT is however negative, indicating that increasing CIT tends to reduce capital expenditures in Nigeria. On the other hand, the coefficient of PPT is positive which indicates that only PPT tends to directly improve capital expenditure or indirect improve long run macroeconomic performance through the channel of capital expenditure in Nigeria. The coefficient of public debt failed the significance test in the long run estimates, while the coefficient of exchange rate is significant at the 5 percent level and also possesses a negative sign. This implies that in the long run, exchange rate depreciation tends to limit capital expenditures in Nigeria. In particular every one percent rise in CIT was found to be consistent with a 0.877 percent rise in VAT, while a percent rise in PPT is accompanied by an increase in CIT by 0.93 percentage point. The relationship was found to be strong in Nigeria and also suggests that tax revenue in Nigeria is linked. the study found that only direct taxes led to improvement in exchange rate in the long run. This implies that direct taxes may be more effective in maintaining macroeconomic stability in Nigeria than application of indirect taxes. increases in indirect taxes tend to produce external effects that do not fully guarantee improvements in macroeconomic in Nigeria. direct tax component only improves exchange rate. Indeed, it was found that CIT revenues essentially lead to reduction in capital expenditure in the long run in Nigeria. That both PPT and CIT have significant negative impacts on exchange rate in the long run in Nigeria, indicating only the direct component of the tax structure in Nigeria significantly enhances exchange rate performance in Nigeria over time, while the effect of indirect tax components is insignificant. That only PPT has a significant indirect or channeled impact on macroeconomic performance through the capital expenditure in Nigeria. We recommend that government should pursue policies and programs that would help ensure exchange rate stability and boost local production for both consumption and export. In addition, a holistic program of economic reforms is important to complement the exchange rate policy and stimulate economic growth
References
Abidemi C. Adegboye, (2020). Macroeconomic policies and sustainable employment yields in sub‐Saharan Africa," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 32(4), 515-527, December.
Agbeyegbe, T. D., Stotsky, J., & WoldeMariam, A. (2006). Trade liberalization, exchange rate changes, and tax revenue in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Asian Economics, 17(2), 261–284. doi:10.1016/j. asieco.2005.09.003
Aggrey, J. (2011). Determinants of tax revenue: Evidence from Ghana (Doctoral dissertation, thesis submitted to the Department of Economics, University of Cape Coast [Google Scholar]).
Ahmed, Qazi Masood and Muhammad, Sulaiman D., Determinant of Tax Buoyancy: Empirical Evidence from Developing Countries (April 3, 2010). European Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp.408-418, 2010. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1583943.
Aliyu, S. U. R. (2009a). “Exchange Rate Volatility and Export Trade in Nigeria: An Empirical Investigation”. MPRA paper No. 13490. Retrieved from http://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/13490/
Aliyu, S. U. R. (2009b). “Impact of Oil Price Shock and Exchange Rate Volatility on Economic Growth in Nigeria: An Empirical Investigation”. MPRA Paper No. 16319. Retrieved from http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/16319/
Aliyu, S. U. R. (2010). “Exchange Rate Pass-Through in Nigeria: Evidence from a Vector Error Correction Model”.Conference paper presented in University of Oxford. Retrieved from http://www.csae.ox.ac.uk/conferences/2010 EDiA/papers/012-Aliyu.pdf
Balcilar, M., Demirer, R., and Hammoudeh, S. (2013). Investor herds and regime-switching: Evidence from Gulf Arab stock markets. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money 23, 295-321
Clement A.U. Ighodaro and Abidemi C. Adegboye (2020) Long run analysis of tourism and economic growth in Nigeria International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies 13(3),286-301https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEPEE.2020.109047
Chaudhry, S., & Munir, F. (2010). Determinants of low tax revenue in Pakistan, Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, 30(2), 439-452.
De Grauwe, P. (1988). Exchange rate variability and the slowdown in growth of international trade. (IMF Staff Papers35(1)).Washington, DC. USA: IMF Staff Papers.
De Vita, G., & Abbott, A. (2004). Real exchange rate volatility and US exports: An ARDL bounds testing approach. Economic Issues, 9(1), 69–78.
Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366a), 427–431.
Efuntade, A.O., Efuntade, O.O., & Akinola, A.O. (2020). Tax revenue and its effect on government expenditure in Nigeria. The International Journal of Business & Management, 8(9), 111-125.
Finkelstein, A. & Notowidigdo, M. (2018).. Take-up and Targeting: Experimental Evidence from SNAP," NBER Working Papers 24652, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
Ferede, Ergete and Dahlby, Bev (2012). The Effect of Corporate Income Tax on the Economic Growth Rates of the Canadian Province). The School of Public Policy Publications, 2019, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3472384
Folster, S., & Henrekson, M. (2001). Growth effects of government expenditure and taxation in rich countries. European Economic Review, 45(8), 1501-1520.
Fierro, V., & Reisen, H. (1990), “Tax revenue implications of the real exchange rate: Econometric evidence from Korea and Mexico”, OECD Development Centre Working Papers, No. 12, OECD Publishing, Paris, DOI: 10.1787/171303142365.
Granger,C.W.(1988).Somerecentdevelopmentinaconcept ofcausality. Journalof Econometrics, 39(1–2), 199–211. Gupta, A. S. (2007). Determinants of tax revenue efforts in developing countries.IMF Working Papers, pp. 1-39, 2007. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract= 1007933
Kwesi Ofori et al., Cogent Economics & Finance (2018), 6: 1537822 https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2018.1537822 Page 12 of 17
Quiros-Romero, G. & Reinsdorf, M.B. (2020). Measuring economic welfare: What and how? IMF Policy Papers. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/Policy-Papers/Issues/2020/05/18/Measuring-Economic-Welfare-What-and-How-49438
Oluyomi, A. & Ogunrinola, O. I. (2011). Employment and economic growth nexus in Nigeria”, International Journal of Business and Social Sciences 2(11), 12-17
Ogunleye, E. R. (2009). Exchange Rate Volatility and Foreign Direct Investment in SubSaharan Africa: Evidence from Nigeria and South Africa In. Adeola Adenikinju, Dipo Busari and Sam Olofin (ed.) Applied Econometrics and Macroeconomic Modelling in Nigeria. Ibadan University Press.
Olowe, R. A. (2009). Modelling Naira/Dollar Exchange Rate Volatility: Application of GARCH and Assymetric Models. International Review of Business Research Papers, Vol. 5, No. 3. Pg.377-398
Pesaran, M.H., Shin, Y. and Smith, R. (2001) Bounds Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Level Relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16, 289-326.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.616
Rajkarnikar, P. Goodwin, N., & Roach, B. (2019). Macroeconomic Measurement: Environmental and Social Dimensions. Global Development and Environment Institute Module.
Rendahl, P. (2016). Fiscal Policy in an unemployment crisis. The Review of Economic Studies, 83(3), 1189-1224.
Stotsky, M. J. G., & WoldeMariam, M. A. (1997). Tax effort in sub-Saharan Africa (No. 97-107). International Monetary Fund.
Tanzi, V. (1989). The impact of macroeconomic policies on the level of taxation and the fiscal balance in developing countries. Staff Papers, 36(3), 633–656. doi:10.2307/3867050
Yinusa, D.O. (2008). “Between dollarization and Exchange Rate Volatility: Nigeria’s Portfolio Diversification Option”. Journal of Policy Modeling. Vol. 30, Issue 5, Pg. 811-826.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ambaiowei Tari Ebiowei, Asian Asian Umobong

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)


