Proposed Inquiry on the Relationship between Feedback, Task-Related Efficacy and Job Performance

Authors

  • Winarto Winarto Universitas Methodist Indonesia, Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47747/snfmi.v2i1.2305

Abstract

Feedback has long played a central role in learning theory and performance. It provides the process and mechanism on how an actor assesses his/her past effort efficacy and also recognizes areas of needed improvements. Drawing from these arguments, feedback is essential aspect that is needed to track and improve job performance. The proposed inquiry offers a theoretical research model which examines the role of task-related efficacy, the content of feedback and the way a message is conveyed. A proposed research method is offered which explains the research opportunity to prove the proposed theoretical model.

References

Anseel, F., Van Yperen, N. W., Janssen, O., & Duyck, W. (2011). Feedback type as a moderator of the relationship between achievement goals and feedback reactions. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology , 84, 703-722.

Barr, S. H., & Conlon, E. J. (1994). Effects of distribution of feedback in work groups. The Academy of Management Journal , 37 (3), 641-655.

Becker, T. E., & Klimoski, R. J. (1989). A field study of the relationship between the organizational feedback environment and performance. Personnel Psychology , 42, 343-358.

Belschak, F. D., & Den Hertog, D. N. (2009). Consequences of positive and negative feedback: The impact on emotions and extra-role behaviors. Applied Psychology: An International Review , 58 (2), 274-303.

Bracken, D. W., & Rose, D. S. (2011). When does 360-degree feedback create behavior change? And how would we know it when it does? Journal of Bussiness and Psychology , 26, 183-192.

Davis, W. D., Carson, C. M., Ammeter, A. P., & Treadway, D. C. (2005). The interactive effects of goal orientation and feedback specificity on task performance. Human Performance , 18 (4), 409-426.

Fedor, D. B., & Buckley, M. R. (1984). Providing feedback to organizational members: A reconsideration. Journal of Business and Psychology , 2 (2), 171-181.

Grant, A. M., & Parker, S. K. (2009). 7 redesigning work design theories: The rise of relational and proactive perspectives. The Academy of Management Annals , 3 (1), 317-375.

Grant, A. M., Fried, Y., & Juillerat, T. (2010). Work matters: Job design in classic and contemporary perspectives. In S. Zedeck, APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 417-453). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Herold, D. M., & Greller, M. M. (1977). Feedback: The definition of a construct. Academy of Management Journal , 20 (1), 142-147.

Jordan, A. H., & Pino, A. G. (2012). Self-enhancement and learning from performance feedback. Academy of Management Review , 37 (2), 221-231.

Lee, J. S., & Akhtar, S. (1996). Determinants of employee willingness to use feedback for performance improvement: cultural and organizational interpretations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management , 7 (4), 878-890.

Liden, R. C., & Mitchell, T. R. (1985). Reactions to feedback: The role of attributions. Academy of Management Journal , 28 (2), 291-308.

Luthans, F., & Peterson, S. J. (2003). 360-Degree feedback with systematic coaching: Empirical analysis suggests a winning combination. Human Resources Management , 42 (3), 243-256.

Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology , 91 (6), 1321–1339.

Nadler, D. A. (1979). The effects of feedback on task group behavior: A review of the experimental research. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance , 23, 309-338.

Nemeroff, W. F., & Cosentino, J. (1979). Utilizing feedback and goal setting to increase performance appraisal interviewer skills of manager. Academy of Management Journal , 22 (3), 566-576.

Parker, S. K., Wall, T. D., & Cordery, J. L. (2001). Future work design research and practice: Towards an elaborated model of work design. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology , 74, 413-440.

Van den Bossche, P., Segers, M., & Jansen, N. (2010). Transfer of training: the role of feedback in supportive social networks. International Journal of Training and Development , 14 (2), 81-94.

Van der Vegt, G. S., de Jong, S. B., Bunderson, J. S., & Molleman, E. (2010). Power asymetry and learning in teams: The moderating role of performance feedback. Organization Science , 21 (2), 347-361.

Van Dijk, D., & Kluger, A. N. (2011). Task type as a moderator of positive/negative feedback effects on motivation and performance: A regulatory focus perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior , 32, 1084–1105.

Vigoda-Gadot, E., & Angert, L. (2007). Goal setting theory, job feedback, and OCB: Lessons from a longitudinal study. Basic and Applied Social Psychology , 29 (2), 119-128.

Whitaker, B. G., & Levy, P. (2012). Linking feedback quality and goal orientation to feedback seeking and job performance. Human Performance , 25 (2), 159-178.

Zellars, K. L., Perrewe, P. L., Rossi, A. M., Tepper, B. J., & Ferris, G. R. (2008). Moderating effects of political skill, perceived control, and job-related self-efficacy on the relationship between negative affectivity and physiological strain. Journal of Organizational Behavior , 29, 549-571.

Downloads

Published

2024-11-21